NFL Refs Suck

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Who is Walt Coleman?


Who is Walt Coleman? If you watch NFL football with any regularity, you've seen him. Maybe you've never really noticed him, but you've most likely heard his name. How do I know that? Because Walt Coleman is perhaps the worst referee in the NFL. A ref with a history of blown calls, yet, still employed by the league. Think it's just me? Let's take a look at some of Walt's finer moments on the field...

NFL TICKETS -- Super Bowl Tickets -- Panthers Tickets -- Buccaneers Tickets

Doug Farrar - Seahawks.NET:

"First of all, I’m not blaming this loss primarily on the refs – I’m blaming this loss primarily on Ray Rhodes, and we’ll get to that later. But given the Seahawks’ relationship with the NFL’s referees over the last two seasons, it was fitting (and almost karmically humorous) that this game was presided over by Walt Coleman, the only official in any sport on any level that has an entire webpage devoted solely to his incompetence. Yes, Walt Coleman versus the Seattle Seahawks…why, you could see the first headlight gleam of the 18-wheeler coming straight at you before the game even started!...By the way, good to know that boneheadedness like Coleman’s is rewarded with at least one playoff game just about every year. Good to know that the NFL is living up to their alleged disciplinary standards."


Rodney Lakin - Football.com:

"You also have Walt Coleman, a referee who is quickly developing a reputation as the most incompetent official in all of professional sports...Three steps may not be, but three strikes should be enough for the NFL to finally step in and end Walt Coleman's reign as a head referee during football games."


Sid Hartman - Minnesota Star Tribune:

"The national telecast of the Vikings-Packers game on Sunday night wasn't the right time for Walter Coleman and his crew to put on the worst exhibition of NFL officiating I have seen in my 42 years of covering the Vikings."


Kevin Siefert and Kent Youngblood - Minnesota Star Tribune:

"Fallout continued Wednesday from the wild conclusion to the Vikings' 26-22 loss Sunday in Green Bay. In a confidential memorandum, the NFL acknowledged its officiating crew made at least nine mistakes during the game -- including a pass interference call that negated a Vikings interception on the Packers' game-winning drive, according to a league source who saw the document...While all nine plays had an impact on the game, certainly the most crucial was the 28-yard penalty called on Chavous by referee Walt Coleman's crew."


San Francisco Chronicle Staff:

"Incomplete forward pass? Shake the snow globe again. We must have been seeing things. Certainly referee Walt Coleman was when he got in front of that replay monitor Saturday night in Foxboro.

Since when is an obvious attempt to tuck the ball part of a forward pass? According to Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2 of the NFL rulebook, whenever the quarterback moves his arm forward to pass and the ball ends up coming out, it is a forward pass and not a fumble.

According to Mike Pereira, head of officiating for the NFL "Brady, at that point, was not trying to pass the ball, but it comes to his (left) hand. He never controlled it long enough to consider him a runner, nor does he try to bring it up again to pass." Thus, when Charles Woodson hit New England QB Tom Brady -- who was in full tuck mode, as everyone could see -- Brady's arm movement was merely the continuation of a forward pass because Brady somehow wasn't in possession of the ball he'd never let go of since the snap. We hope this little discussion has helped clear up any lingering confusion you may have had regarding this matter."


Rob Rossi - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Columnist:

"This week's No. 1 star: Walt Coleman

Who: Walt Coleman, NFL official

What: Overruled his own fumble call and allowed New England to keep possession on a drive that ended with a tying field goal that sent the other AFC divisional playoff game into overtime

When: Jan. 19

Where: Foxboro Stadium, Foxboro, Mass.

Why: By reversing his original ruling -- that Patriots quarterback Tom Brady had fumbled the ball while being hit by Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson -- Coleman gave new life to New England. The Patriots took advantage and sent the game into overtime, where they won to advance to the AFC championship game Sunday against the Steelers at Heinz Field

How: Pretty simple stuff that nobody understands. In the final two minutes of any NFL game, all questionable plays that are eligible to be reviewed are automatically reviewed. Brady's apparent fumble came with the Patriots driving, but trailing the Raiders, 13-10, with less than two minutes left in regulation. Though no Patriots player argued that Brady's arm was in a throwing motion when Woodson hit him, the play was still subject to review despite Coleman's ruling that Brady had fumbled the ball (the Raiders had recovered). Upon reviewing the play, Coleman reversed his decision and ruled the play as an incomplete pass, and New England maintained possession.

The Skinny: According to an NFL rule nobody cared to know before this game, Brady was indeed still in throwing motion when he began to tuck the ball away. Stupid? Most definitely..."


Dr. Z - Sports Illustrated:

"Smith, running like a maniac, off to a career night, breaks his hand in the first half, presumably on his long TD, the last 10 yards of which were accomplished with his hand firmly grabbing the facemask of cornerback Kenny Wright. No call, of course. But the no-calls balanced out when Cris Carter got away with grabbing Darren Woodson's jersey and yanking him out of the way on the Vikings' go-ahead TD. The superstar syndrome. These guys get away with murder. Walt Coleman's officiating crew blew another one by not flagging Duane Clemons for the punch to the groin of Flozell Adams. Don't get me started on officiating."


Dr. Z - Sports Illustrated:

"Now we come to Buffalo-New England. I was lucky enough to get coaching tapes of that one. What they showed was that the worst call wasn't the interference in the end zone on the Hail Mary.

This is what happened:

The Patriots, with the ball on the Bills' 26 and time for one play, ran three wideouts down the left side. The Bills defended it with five DBs. The interesting thing was that unlike most Hail Marys, when everything is bunched into a big cluster, there was clear separation between all receivers and defenders. That's what made any interference fairly easy to spot.

Irvin could have made the play on the ball but he froze. Glenn went up for it, and Jones loosely grabbed him around the waist -- not a blatant grab, but there was contact. The ball hit Glenn in the chest, the flag came down. If the contact had been made in the middle of a milling mob, with everyone bumping everyone else, then I'd agree that it was outrageous, but as I said, there was room for the official to get a clear look at the play. A close call, but not an especially bad one.

The really bad call came on the play preceding that one. The Patriots had fourth and nine on the Bills' 36. Drew Bledsoe threw a sideline pass to Jefferson. He went up for the ball, stretched and came down with it out-of-bounds. The question was: Were his feet in at the moment of the catch? No, they weren't. It appeared that Jefferson lifted his left foot just before the ball arrived. The right foot was clearly in the air. Uh-uh, no catch.

The Bills have to get over that awful loss to New England, courtesy of Walt Coleman's officiating crew."


Dr. Z - Sports Illustrated:

"I'd be screaming bloody murder at this point if they would have lost the Eagles game on that phony decision that Todd Pinkston did not step out of bounds on his 45-yard catch. Hey, Walt Coleman, three steps on the line isn't enough for you? Better get your eyes checked, buddy."


Sportsgambling.about.com:

"I do not care what anybody says. Walt Coleman is not qualified to work little league. Coleman blatantly and directly made up a pair of phantom calls to snatch victory from the Indianapolis Colts and hand it over to The San Francisco 49ers. Incompetence is not even a valid excuse for the officiating in that game, as quite frankly, it bordered on criminal and I am surprised that there has not been an FBI investigation into that game. Further cause for Investigation, Coleman's crew did the same thing to Buffalo, granting New England a "miracle" come from behind victory, by giving The Pats a blatant out of bounds catch and then followed it up with a phantom pass interference on a Hail Mary.

Coleman's officiating is simply embarrassing to the league, disgusting to the fans and bordering on criminal in nature. It is exactly this type of officiating which convinces many that NFL officials cannot be omnipotent in the new big money NFL. Coleman's incompetence may be the best argument for the return of replay, and if so, then there is a silver lining to every cloud."


Associated Press:

"This week, coach Bill Cowher said the NFL acknowledged referee Walt Coleman should have granted Pittsburgh a touchdown after reviewing a play in a 23-20 loss to Tennessee.

"It should have been a touchdown," Cowher said Tuesday. "That's great to know."

On the final play of the third quarter, Graham threw a 17-yard pass to Hines Ward, who was ruled down at the Tennessee 1-yard line. Cowher challenged the call, and Coleman ruled the replay was inconclusive, costing the Steelers a timeout as well as the score. The loss of the timeout came into play when, on the Steelers' final drive, Pittsburgh used its final timeout before Kris Brown missed a 50-yard field-goal attempt. "We would have had another timeout at the end of the game," Cowher said. "There are a lot of things that could have taken place."

Cowher called the incident "water over the dam," but said the Steelers (0-3) have enough problems without them being compounded by officiating errors."


Ron Cook, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Columnist:

"Let's start by saying the Steelers deserved to win. It would have been a tragedy of the worst kind, at least in this city, if they had not held on to win, 30-15. But that doesn't make another bad call by another NFL official any easier to take. Certainly, it doesn't make the Jaguars whiners for complaining. "That was a blown call," said wide receiver Keenan McCardell. "Real blown."

Here's what happened:

Brunell, trying to bring the Jaguars back from a 23-15 deficit, faced a second-and-10 at the Steelers' 42 with a little more than three minutes left. Avoiding pressure, he rolled to his left and spotted McCardell behind Lee Flowers down the left sideline, but his underthrown pass allowed Flowers to catch up to McCardell. There clearly was contact between the two before the ball arrived. Flowers never looked for the ball, which bounced off his helmet as McCardell tried to catch it at the Steelers' 1.

To the naked eye, it looked like blatant pass interference. On replay, it looked much worse.

"The back judge [Bob Lawing] made the call," Jaguars Coach Tom Coughlin said of what actually was a non-call. "I had a hard time with that one." "[Lawing] told me the ball landed out of bounds," McCardell said. That was true, but only after it bounced off Flowers' helmet. He and McCardell were in bounds at the critical moment. Walt Coleman told pool reporter Jim Wexell after the game. "You have to have contact to have interference...even though [Flowers] wasn't playing the ball. There's not a foul for face-guarding." "Are you telling me that if the guy doesn't try for the ball and runs right through me, it's not a penalty?" McCardell asked. "That was truly face-guarding. That's a terrible call."

The whole thing was unfortunate because there's no way to prevent it short of hiring better officials. Even if there were instant replay, this wouldn't have been covered because it was a judgment call. And, although the human element is and always should be a part of the game, it's sad to see big games influenced by an official's mistake.


Dave Goldberg, AP Writer:

"This was one of those weeks when the officials got noticed, not a good thing from the league standpoint.

The biggest brouhaha was in San Francisco, where there were questions about calls that nullified two end zone interceptions by the Colts and allowed a touchdown by San Francisco. Indianapolis coach Jim Mora said there was even an argument between referee Walt Coleman and another official on one of the penalties, a holding call against the Colts. "After the official that worked our side argued (with Coleman) that it wasn't defensive holding, he came back to me and said it was offensive holding, if anything," Indianapolis coach Jim Mora said. "It was a horrible, horrible job by the officials.

Later, on the 49ers' final drive, there was a pass interference call that gave San Francisco 27 yards on its final job, setting up Wade Richey's chip-shot field goal to win it. Replays showed there was incidental contact on the play, nothing egregious enough to essentially hand San Francisco the game."


Peter King, Sports Illustrated:

"Colts 31, 49ers 20 We've corrected the score because referee Walt Coleman's crew robbed Indianapolis blind at 3Com Park on Sunday and handed San Francisco a 34-31 gift. Peyton Manning really beat the Niners with a fearless, three-touchdown, no-interception day."

Conspiracy Theory?

"The Raiders are watched closer than Al Qaeda" - Al Davis

I am an Oakland Raiders fan. I always have been and always will be. Am I the best judge of officiating with regards to the Raiders? No. Do I think there is a conspiracy in the NFL against the Raiders? No. Do I think NFL officials and the league in general unfairly target the Raiders and hold them to a different standard than their opponents? HELL YES!


Schedule goes easy on 49ers, not Raiders
Nancy Gay, San Francisco Chronicle, 4/12/07

The 2006 season wasn't kind to the Raiders, and the 2007 schedule isn't cutting them any breaks, either.

Along with the Buffalo Bills, they are saddled with the toughest schedule statistically in the NFL this season.

But you won't hear the 49ers complain about their lineup of opponents.

After narrowly missing the playoffs last season, the 49ers ended up with one of the NFL's softest '07 schedules, facing teams that had a combined .469 winning percentage in '06.

As previously announced, the NFL is spotlighting the 49ers' Sept. 10 season opener at home against the Arizona Cardinals as a marquee ESPN Monday Night matchup between two rising young quarterbacks: Alex Smith vs. Matt Leinart.

In all, the 49ers have four nationally televised games this season, against the Cardinals, the Seahawks, the Bengals and the Buccaneers. The Raiders have no nationally-televised games on tap.

The NFL released its full 17-week, 256-game regular-season schedule Wednesday to much fanfare, with the Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts garnering four prime-time television appearances, starting with the league's regular-season debut, a Thursday night Sept. 6 game at home against the NFC runner-up New Orleans Saints. That game marks the sixth consecutive year the NFL has opened its regular season on a Thursday.

Burdened with the worst record in the NFL last season at 2-14, the Raiders will be facing the league's most difficult cast of opponents in 2007. Once they get past their regular-season opener, at home Sept. 9 against the Detroit Lions (3-13 in 2006), the schedule gets a lot tougher.

Combined, the Raiders' opponents had a .539 winning percentage in 2006, and all three of their AFC West opponents finished .500 or better. September may be the Raiders' easiest month: After opening against the Lions, they travel to Denver for a Sept. 16 AFC West game against the Broncos before returning home to face the Browns at the Coliseum on Sept. 23. They finish the month with a long road trip to Miami for a Sept. 30 game against the Dolphins, followed by an Oct. 7 bye.


As a rule, Raiders 'always involved'
Bruce Adams, San Francisco Chronicle - 11/28/06

Raiders coach Art Shell is burning up his minutes. He sounds like he may be quietly burning up on the inside as well.

On the flight back from San Diego on Sunday night after the Raiders' 21-14 loss to the Chargers, Shell phoned Mike Pereira, the NFL's director of officiating, to ask about the latest bizarre ruling that went against his team. Monday, he said he'd be calling Pereira again for further clarification.

"Somewhere hidden in the rule book, there's something there," Shell said. "But they seem to dig it up when we play."

Shell didn't learn anything in his airborne call that he hadn't already been told by referee Mike Carey at the game.

Appearances aside, Chargers receiver Vincent Jackson's spinning the ball onto the turf in celebration of a 1st-down catch was by rule an incomplete forward pass -- an illegal one at that since he was 13 yards beyond the line of scrimmage.

It was not a fumble, as the Raiders thought at the time, with cornerback Fabian Washington falling on what he took to be a live ball.

Those are the rules -- for now.

"It seems like the Raiders are always involved in these types of things," Shell said. "Any time there's a rule change, it becomes a Raider rule, and most of those things go against us. So I'm sure they'll look at it and come up with an answer."

The Raiders were leading 14-7 at the time. Instead of losing the ball on the turnover, the Chargers were penalized 5 yards, kept possession, tied the score and then scored the go-ahead touchdown six minutes later.

"It's unfortunate, when those plays happen we do seem to catch the wrong end of it," Shell said.

That's an argument that's hard to refute. Such rulings, often strange and sometimes rarely used, have become part of Raider lore.

In a playoff game in January 2002, New England quarterback Tom Brady apparently fumbled and lost the ball to the Raiders on a sack. Instead, it was ruled an incomplete pass under the so-called tuck rule and the Patriots came back to win the game.

In the January 1978 AFC Championship, back before instant replay, Denver's Rob Lytle was ruled to have scored the go-ahead touchdown even though replays showed he lost the ball before crossing the goal line with the Raiders recovering.

And in the playoffs in December 1972, the Steelers beat the Raiders in the closing seconds of the game on the "Immaculate Reception," with Franco Harris coming up with a pass the Raiders contend was illegal because it was tipped first by Pittsburgh's Frenchy Fuqua.

Shell may not be happy with the results. But he understands, having spent five years as the NFL's vice president for football operations and development before rejoining the Raiders this year for his second stint as head coach.

"So the gist of the rule book, the interpretation of the rule book, coming out of the league office," he said, "we have to live with it."

The ruling at San Diego was the second time in recent weeks a rarely used call has shifted momentum against the Raiders. In the 17-13 loss to the Broncos at the Coliseum on Nov. 12, the Raiders' Chris Carr was charged with unsportsmanlike conduct for not returning to the field soon enough after he was knocked out of bounds while going downfield in punt coverage. The penalty negated a fumble and recovery by the Raiders on the punt. At the time, Oakland was leading 13-7. Shell was fined $12,500 by the NFL for complaining about the officiating in that game.
An excellent article by SF Chronicle writer Nancy Gay suggests that perhaps Raider fans are on to something when they talk of a conspiracy. This is one of the few times I've seen the media lend any credence to the "conspiracy theory". Gay writes...

"Along the way, owner Al Davis and the Raiders have been convinced that the league office and the officials are out to get them every game. Sure, there have obvious lousy calls.

The NFL office, for example, quietly informed the Raiders days after their 23-17 loss to Kansas City that, yes, the officials erred in calling offensive holding on wide receiver Randy Moss in the end zone, negating a second-quarter touchdown.

"We're never gonna get calls. We go in thinking that every week," said safety Derrick Gibson, who -- not surprisingly -- commits more than his share.

So while it isn't exactly a full-blown conspiracy, there are merits to some of the Raiders' arguments. It's up to Turner to ensure the penalty history doesn't continue to be an excuse, rather than an explanation, for losing."


Scheduling...

I don't know how many Raiders fans truly believe in an anti-Raider conspiracy. I personally do not believe there is a conspiracy to stick it to the Raider organization. It does; however, seem as though year after year there is ample evidence to support the conclusion that the league has it's favorites and the Raiders are not among them. Take for example the 2005 schedule. The Raiders (5-11, last place in the AFC West in 2004) open the season AT New England, host Kansas City, then travel to Philadelphia in week 3. Two east coast trip in three weeks...both against last years Super Bowl teams.

Meanwhile, lets take a look at the Denver Broncos. The Broncos finished last season 10-6, and made the playoffs as a wild card team. Do they travel to New England and Philadelphia the first few weeks of the season? No! They open the season at Miami, then host San Diego and Kansas City. In fact, Denver HOSTS both New England and Philadelphia.

I'm aware that the schedules are pre-set to a degree with regards to opponents. But dates and home/away are determined much later based on numerous factors. Funny how when all is said and done, the Raiders usually seem to end up getting screwed. Conspiracy? I'll let you draw your own conclusions.


BALCO Double Standard

Ever hear of BALCO? BALCO is the Burlingame, California company (owned by Victor Conte) accused of providing top athletes with steroids.

The entire investigation into BALCO started with a stakeout of the Bay Area company. Newsweek wrote that Federal Agents "watched famous athletes visit BALCO headquarters, possibly to get the steroids" When the story first broke in September 2003 after authorities raided the BALCO offices, the San Jose Mercury News wrote: "Conte is well known for helping athletes, from 49ers and Raiders players ... to Olympic stars and bodybuilders." An October 2003 report at ESPN.com contained a 49ers connection: "(Renaldo) Nehemiah said he was sent to BALCO by the San Francisco 49ers in the early 1980s for testing because he was lethargic and it was thought he had some sort of nutritional deficiency." According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Colorado investigators took a written statement from former-49er Martin Harrison in connection with the BALCO-Romanowski relationship. Harrison testified that Romanowski "pushed a speed pill" on him "and provided the pill to other 49ers in 1992 or 1993".

When the NFL conducted it's investigation, it appears only 10 NFL Players were tested for the steroid THG. Of the 10, 7 were Oakland Raiders...none were SF 49ers. It's interesting to note that despite numerous links between the San Francisco 49ers and BALCO, PLUS the fact that 3 of the players tested were former 49ers, the league focused its investigation on the Raiders. Bias? Nah...


And More Scheduling...

Raider fans have long complained that they don't receive a fair shake from the league whether it be calls on the field, treatment by the leagues executives or the schedule they face. One website conducted a study of warm weather (west coast, south, dome) teams scheduled to play cold weather games each season. The logic, of course, is that for a warm weather team, playing a game in the extreme cold of an east coast winter is a distinct advantage for the home team. The Green Bay Packers come to mind as a perfect example of a team that rarely loses a home game in the cold. Shockingly (note the sarcasm), the study found that the Raiders had the highest percentage of cold weather games scheduled...

Team ------------- Scheduled Percentage
49ers....................34.8%
Cowboys................37.8%
Vikings..................40.4%
Dolphins................43.4%
Rams....................44.8%
Oilers...................52.7%
Buccaneers.............53.9%
Raiders.................56.4%


A few memorable officiating gems:

12/24/04 - For some reason, NFL officials seem to have a habit of screwing the Raiders out of fumble recoveries. With Oakland leading 24-21 early in the 4th qtr, Chief receiver Eddie Kennison caught a pass, ran several yards and was nailed by a Raider defender. As Kennison went down, the ball popped out and was recovered by the Raiders. Despite the fact that replay CLEARLY showed Kennison had fumbled, the officials had blown the whistle as Kennison was going down, thus nullifying the fumble and any chance to overturn the play on replay. “It is out long before Kennison’s elbow hits the ground” said announcer Dan Dierdorf. “How did they miss that?” replied announcer Dick Enberg. That’s a real good question, Dick. How did they miss it? Better yet, why the hell is the official so quick to blow the whistle? Oh yeah, I forgot. It’s the Raiders.

11/28/04 - What a joke. In all my years of watching NFL football, I've never seen a more blatant example of pass interference not called. Raider receiver Ronald Curry is absolutely blindsided by Bronco Safety Kenoy Kennedy on a pass play with the ball a good 20 yards away, yet no flag. Flabbergasted, announcer Joe Theismann exclaimed "In this league, if that's not pass interference, then I don't know what is" to the agreement of the rest of the broadcasting crew.

In fairness, I'm willing to accept that officials can't see everything (thought it's pretty pathetic that a professional NFL Official would miss such a blatant penalty). In Major League Baseball, for example, what will often happen is that the umpire will make up for the mistake by letting something slide later in the game, or perhaps calling a close play the other way. But this isn't baseball, and we're talking about the Raiders. On the very next Bronco possession, Raider CB Denard Walker is flagged for a marginal pass interference against Denver WR Ashley Lelie. Funny how the officials miss blatant penalties committed by Raider opponents, but throw a flag on every little miscue and imaginary penalty they can identify against the Raiders. Is it any wonder the entire Raider Nation believes the league is biased against the Raider organization?
1/19/02 - In what can only be described as an incorrect analysis of a poorly written rule, the Raiders were screwed out of a trip to the AFC title game by referee Walt Coleman who saw one thing, yet ruled another. With less than 2 minutes remaining in regulation and the Raiders up by three points, cornerback Charles Woodson sacked Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, forcing the slippery ball out of his hands. Oakland linebacker Greg Biekert recovered the loose ball near mid field. New England, out of time outs, also appeared to be out of the playoffs.

Then they decided to review the call on the replay monitor.

After further review, Coleman ruled that Brady had moved his arm forward before Woodson forced the ball loose. Replay clearly shows Brady with both hands on the ball just before he was hit and fumbled. Furthermore, the original call on the field was a fumble. To overturn the call, officials would need conclusive evidence that the original call was wrong. One clever fan pointed out that based on Coleman's interpretation of the rule "Walt Coleman and the NFL have created the no-fumble, no- sack quarterback Step 1: After taking the snap, QB steps back and cocks arm immediately. Step 2: As he drops back in the pocket, QB very, very slowly moves ball forward. Step 3: If hit, QB drops ball at his feet for an incomplete pass. Step 4: If protection holds up, QB finds open receiver, re-cocks arm and throws. Defensive ends will still enjoy hitting the quarterback, but they'll never chalk up another sack."

New England, with its possession revived, produced a 45-yard game-tying field goal with 27 seconds left. In overtime, New England kicker Adam Vinatieri made a 23-yarder to send the Raiders home for the winter.

Naturally, the NFL tried to cover up the botched call by explaining that according to the Tuck Rule, the call was correct. The Tuck Rule reads..."NFL Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2, Note 2: When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble." Note the part that reads "if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble". Now look at the replay and photo above. In both images, Brady has returned the ball to his body and has both hands on the ball as he is hit and fumbles. According to the Tuck Rule, this constitutes a fumble. However, NFL officials attempted to cover their tracks.

NFL Supervisor of Officials Mike Pereira hit the Spin Room running on the Sunday following the game, prop football in hand, saying that when the rule was rewritten in 2000 to absolve the refs of judging "intent to pass", it meant that no fumble is called if a quarterback's arm is in a throwing motion or a pump-fake, and the ball comes loose before the ball is literally tucked back into the body--and here he mimed placing the ball under the arm, like a running back, saying "The ball has to be all the way back at the side of your body, then get jarred loose for it to be a fumble." This echoed Coleman's contention of the night before (again: "He would have had to have brought it all the way in and got it all the way underneath his arm in order for it [to be a fumble]"). Now let me ask you, where does the Tuck Rule state the ball has to be tucked under the quarterbacks arm like a running back? Furthermore, do you ever see a quarterback holding a football tucked under his arm unless he is running down field? If, according to Mike Pereira and Walt Coleman, a quarterback has to tuck the ball under his arm, then virtually every fumble ever committed by a quarterback in NFL history has been a bad call by the officials.

9/9/01 - Wrote David Bush, SF Chronicle Columnist "The Kansas City Chiefs and the hostile environment of a packed Arrowhead Stadium were not all the Raiders had to overcome yesterday. They also had to brush aside the errors of a bumbling group of replacement officials and their own misdeeds, but ultimately they prevailed 27-24 in their season opener...The Raiders lost a scoring chance late in the first half, when the neophyte officials reversed themselves and ruled that Charlie Garner was out of bounds on a 27-yard reception from the Kansas City 39. "I was pushed out," said Garner, who was hit by Jerome Woods as he was coming down with the ball. "It should have been called a catch." Then the officials got into the act again. They botched a crucial spot, and a few plays later, let Greg Biekert get drilled by an illegal helmet-to-helmet hit as he was running with what he thought was a fumble."

1/14/01 - The AFC Championship goes to the Baltimore Ravens 16-3. The loss of Raider QB Rich Gannon on an illegal hit turns the tide of the game. Said SF Chronicle writer Kevin Lynch "Siragusa changed the complexion of the entire game early in the second quarter when he drove his 342 published pounds into quarterback Rich Gannon. It rendered the Raiders' best offensive player and team leader practically useless for the rest of the game". Arguably, the hit came in late and was overly aggressive, yet no flag. Of note is the fact that Siragusa was later fined by the league for the hit. Adding insult to injury, the Raiders last hope for a comeback was dashed when Raider receiver Andre Rison was flagged for offensive pass interference, negating a TD that would have brought the Raiders to within 6 points with just under 5 minutes to play. Replay showed that Rison and Baltimore cornerback Duane Starks had their hands on each other when the pass came toward the end zone. Naturally, the call went against the player wearing silver & black.

12/3/00 - With Oakland trailing 21-20, the Raiders were looking at a 3rd- and-1 from the Steelers 41 with 7 seconds left on the big expensive computerized board and on the official down marker on the field. Quarterback Rich Gannon's screen pass fell incomplete. One slight problem here, it was actually 4th down. Only the scoreboard operators and sideline officials failed to change the down markers. Bottom line, game over.

1/1/78 - Raiders versus Denver in the AFC Championship. Anyone remember a Bronco running back named Rob Lytle? Anyone remember his fumble?
In a game that helped bring instant replay to the NFL, the Denver Broncos defeated the Oakland Raiders 20-17 in the AFC Championship.

The Broncos lead 7-3 midway through the 3rd quarter and had a first and goal at the Oakland 2 yard line. Running back Rob Lytle took the handoff, but was met by Oakland defender Jack Tatum, who knocked the ball out. Raider linebacker Mike McCoy picked up the loose ball and returned it for an apparent Raider touchdown. Unbelievably, after a lengthy discussion, officials ruled no fumble. Denver scored shortly thereafter to take a 14-3 lead. Television replay clearly showed Lytle did fumble. "Sure I fumbled" Lytle later said. In the press box, infuriated Raider owner Al Davis reportedly yelled "What's going on here?!" NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle sat silently a few seats away.

Art McNally, former head of NFL Officials, later admitted "It was a fumble and we were wrong on the call". Gee, thanks.

12/23/72 - Steelers quarterback Terry Bradshaw, faced a 4th and 10 from his own 40 with 22 seconds to go. Bradshaw's pass over the middle intended for Frenchy Fuqua bounces back to Franco Harris who allegedly snatches the ball just before it hits the ground, and rambles untouched into the end zone for the game winning score. Did Fuqua touch the ball? If he did, the pass cannot be legally caught by Harris or any other Steelers receiver. Naturally, after lengthy discussions and a phone call (phone call?, they didn't have replay back then), the officials ruled a touchdown for Pittsburgh. Tatum has always claimed that he didn't touch the ball. Fuqua has remained silent, telling only the late Steelers owner Art Rooney what really happened. Likewise, Franco Harris will not discuss the play, only giving a knowing smile when asked if the ball touched the ground. As an added bonus, Phil Villapiano was blatantly clipped in the open field while giving chase.


And Yet More Scheduling...

Of course, on field officiating is not the only point Raider fans bring up when discussing the conspiracy theory. The 1999 Oakland Raiders schedule provides a classic example. Fresh off an 8-8 season, the Raiders were given the most difficult schedule in the NFL. Wrote David Bush of the San Francisco Chronicle "Some diabolical schedule-maker in the NFL office has presented the team with one of the most difficult opening sequence of games in memory...Four of the Raiders' first six games are on the road, four are against 1998 playoff teams including the defending Super Bowl champions..."

Oakland's opponents had a .570 winning percentage the previous season. The league is quick to remind fans that strength of schedule is based primarily on how well a team performed the previous year. For example, the defending Super Bowl Champions should have a more difficult schedule than an 8-8 team that did not make the playoffs. Usually, that's the case, unless you're referring to the Raiders.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

2006 - Worst Calls of the Year

Double Jeopardy


When is a fumble not a fumble? When an NFL official gets involved. With Tennessee leading 26-17 in the 3rd quarter, Ravens RB Mike Anderson was stripped of the ball. A scrum ensued and defensive tackle Robaire Smith emerged with the football. Unfortunately for the Titans, the officials ruled down by contact.

Tennessee coach Jeff Fisher challenged the play and replay CLEARLY showed Anderson had lost the ball before going down. The officials now changed their ruling, admitted there was a fumble, but claimed because they couldn't tell for sure who recovered the fumble, Baltimore maintained possession. To add insult to injury, Tennessee was charged a timeout for an upheld replay ruling.

When's the last time you saw a fumble and the officials decided they couldn't tell who recovered so they just gave the ball back to the offense?

So basically, the Titans force a fumble, recover it and wind up without the ball and lose a timeout because incompetent officials blew the call not once, but twice on the same play. Typical...


Read the Rulebook

Face Guarding is when a pass defender blindly (not looking back for the ball) throws up his arms in an attempt to block a pass or disrupt the receivers line of sight on the ball. Someone should notify officials that there is no rule against Face Guarding in the NFL. So when Patriots CB Ellis Hobbs was called for a Face Guarding pass interference late in the 3rd quarter; in reality, it was NFL Officials giving a late Christmas gift to the Colts in the form of a first and goal at the one yard line. But the NFL will remind us fans that they're right 98% of the time, or whatever the latest bogus claim is. Fact...a free trip to the one yard line in a tight conference championship game directly impacts the outcome. Sure would be nice to have big games decided by the players, not the officials.


It's Called a Catch

Far too often, officials refuse to admit a mistake despite clear cut, irrefutable visual evidence. For example, Patriots leading 24-7 midway thru the 3rd quarter, the Vikings are driving. Minnesota QB Brad Johnson connects with Tight End Jermaine Wiggins for a first down inside the Patriot 35-yard line. On the catch, Wiggins has full possession, takes three full steps, and turns to head down field. As Wiggins is going down, the ball is stripped by the defense and rolls out of bounds. The correct call SHOULD have been first down at the spot where the ball rolled out of bounds. However, in the fantasy land where some NFL officials reside, the pass is ruled incomplete. Minnesota challenges, yet Referee Larry Nemmers upholds the original call. Minnesota's 4th down pass falls incomplete, and for all intents and purposes, the game is over.

Why does the NFL have replay? The more I see, the more obvious it becomes that the replay system is nothing more than a crap shoot. Time and again, officials still blow the call after replay. If you're incapable of making the correct call after watching a play in slow motion from numerous camera angles provided by millions of dollars in high tech video gear, you have no business officiating an NFL game.

2005 - Worst Calls of the Year

The 12th Man

Super Bowl XL - Seahawks vs Steelers...Let me start by say I'm glad the Steelers won. For financial reasons (insert wink and nod here), I was definitely cheering for Pittsburgh. That said, the Seahawks were robbed. Super Bowl XL showcased a classic example of NFL officials who got too involved in a game and directly affected the outcome. It is an ongoing problem in the NFL and will not change unless enough fans, writers, and sportscasters point out the problem and demand change. The Steelers had a great year and deserve to be champions. But who know how the game would have turned out had the officials backed off and let the players determine the outcome.

First, with just over two minutes remaining in the first quarter, Seattle quarterback Matt Hasselbeck's 16 yard touchdown pass to Darrell Jackson was nullified on a bogus offensive pass interference call. Yeah, Jackson touched Steeler safety Chris Hope. And Hope touched Jackson. Neither contact had any impact on the touchdown catch, but that didn't stop the officials from jumping in and making the first big call of the game. During the halftime show, Michael Irvin described the call as "ticky-tack". Steve Young simply said "That is an absolute touchdown". Both are correct. It was a bad penalty that had no business being called...not in a game of such magnitude. It is very interesting to note that way back in the Week 2 match up of Chiefs at Raiders, Raider receiver Randy Moss was flagged on a nearly identical offensive pass interference call that wiped out a Raiders touchdown. Guess which officiating crew blew the call back in week 2? C'mon...I know you can say it...Bill Leavy's crew! The NFL later apologized to the Raiders and admitted the interference on Moss was a bad call. I wonder if they'll issue a similar apology to the Seahawks?

As bad as the offensive pass interference call was, the holding call against Seattle's Sean Locklear was perhaps even more devastating. Trailing 14-10 early in the 4th quarter, Hasselbeck hit tight end Jeremy Stevens on an 18 yard completion to the Steelers one yard line. Unfortunately, a holding call negated the catch. Replay showed no hold, at least not any hold that doesn't occur on virtually every single pass play in an NFL game. Said commentator John Madden "I didn't see holding". Wrote Skip Bayless for ESPN "On the replay, I couldn't see Locklear do anything different from what most linemen do on every play. These days, you have to tackle to hold, and Locklear didn't tackle...Phantom, killer penalty." Again, on a marginal or "ticky-tack" situation, an NFL official throws a flag and negates a huge play, directly impacting the outcome of the game. It's the Super Bowl! Why are you throwing a flag on a play where no holding is visible? It's almost like cops on the freeway. Everyone speeds, but they occasionally pull someone over just to let us all know they're watching. It sure seems like NFL officials get into the same routine...occasionally calling a random, marginal, or imaginary holding just to remind the offensive line they're being watched.

And, of course there's the absolutely horrible low block call on Hasselbeck following his interception. Shortly after the huge holding call, Hasselbeck was picked off near the goal line by Steelers cornerback Ike Taylor who brought it back to the 29 yard line. For some preposterous reason, Hasselbeck was penalized for a low block call on the play where he made the tackle. "We think that is a bad call" said announcer Al Michaels following the replay and commercial break. Yeah, you think? It's perfectly legal to tackle someone at the knees; you just can't block someone at or below the knees. But since Hasselbeck was clearly the guy who tackled Taylor, how could the officials possibly believe he was blocking and not tackling? It was a horrible call that moved Pittsburgh near midfield where they soon after put the game away on a trick play. "The officials thought they saw something they didn't see" said commentator John Madden.

One final play worth mentioning...the Roethlisberger touchdown run. If you saw the play, you know what I'm referring to. Simply, Roethlisberger scored on a 1 yard touchdown run where it didn't appear the ball ever broke the plane of the goal line. While I never saw any replay showing the ball break the plane, there is a moment on the replay where you just can't tell. The replay rule clearly states that there must be "incontrovertible visual evidence" to overturn a call. Given that the original call on the field was a touchdown, the call had to stand.

Overall, I cannot recall a Super Bowl with more officiating controversy. It's truly a shame the officials played such an integral part with numerous bogus calls against the Seahawks. Nobody pays to see the officials. I want to see the PLAYERS determine the outcome. Perhaps one day, the NFL will take note and the Super Bowl champions will actually be decided by the teams on the field and not the guys wearing stripes.

Other Opinions...

"Here's what referee Bill Leavy's crew did, point blank: It robbed Seattle. The Seahawks could have played better, sure. They could have done more to overcome the poor officiating. We understand that those things happen and all, but even with all the points Seattle left on the field, there's a good chance the Seahawks would have scored more than the Steelers if the officials had let the players play." - Michael Smith, ESPN.com

"The first-quarter offensive pass interference called on Darrell Jackson that turned a touchdown into a field goal was robbery enough. But the fourth-quarter holding call on Sean Locklear made you wonder whether the refs had even less of Aretha's r-e-s-p-E-c-t for your Seahawks than I do...on this night, the Steelers had their own version of your 12th Man. He wore a striped shirt and a whistle. He threw a flag." - Skip Bayless, ESPN.com

"Like a crazed CIA analyst running through the halls of Langley screaming into open offices about some impending calamity, I've been shrieking hysterically about the terrible officiating in the NFL and warning that some day the brutal calls were going to affect the outcome of the Super Bowl. That some day was Sunday. Every single questionable, marginal or outright bad call went against the Seahawks." - Kevin Hench, FOXSPorts.com

"this will always be remembered as the Super Bowl that the referees screwed up." - Aaron Schatz, FOXSports.com

"the Seahawks outplayed the Steelers on the vast majority of plays and still lost, thanks largely to two dubious penalty calls that cost Seattle a TD and a first-and-goal at the 1...Seattle fans have a right to feel sick. Their team just suffered the most unjust loss in Super Bowl history." - Kevin Hench, FOXSports.com

Video Examples...

Seattle wide receiver Darrell Jackson is flagged for offensive pass interference, wiping out a Seahawk touchdown

Phantom holding call on Seattle's Sean Locklear cost the Seahawks 1st and goal at the 1 yard line

Roethlisberger is awarded the timeout even though the play clock had expired.

Seattle QB Matt Hasselbeck flagged for a "low block" even though he CLEARLY is making a tackle



A Comedy of Errors

DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF - STEELERS @ COLTS...Incompetence, ignorance, and absurdity only begin to describe the officiating in Sunday's Steelers-Colts matchup. Never mind the interference that wasn't called on a 2nd quarter deep pass to Steeler receiver Randle El with Pittsburgh up 14-0 and going for the jugular. The real fun started in 4th quarter with two of the worse examples of NFL officiating I've ever seen.

First, with the Steelers leading 21-10 midway thru the 4th quarter and trying to run out the clock, Pittsburgh lined up for a critical 4th and 1 near mid-field. Prior to the snap, Steeler lineman Alan Faneca moved, causing 4 Colts players to jump into the Steeler line. Whistles blew, the officials stepped in, and huddled. The result? The NFL's first ever "do-over". I've never seen a "do-over" in the NFL. Is that a new rule? Hell, the last time I saw a "do-over" was about 20 years ago playing football in the park with a bunch of friends and my buddy Alex caught a pass near the sideline, represented by an imaginary line between two trees. We really couldn't tell if he was in or out, so we called a "do-over". Seems like the NFL would be a bit more structured. One would expect the officials to enforce the rules... it's either a false start on the offense of offsides on the defense. It's never, ever a "do-over". "Faneca did twitch" said announcer Dan Dierdorf.

"Do-over's" aside, the most outrageous call came later in the 4th. The Colts still down 21-10 with under 6 minutes remaining, Pittsburgh Safety Troy Polamalu intercepted Peyton Manning near mid-field. Replay clearly shows Polamalu intercepting the pass, taking two steps, falling to the ground untouched, rolling over, and losing the ball as he tried to stand back up. Polamalu fell on the loose ball. The call on the field was interception, fumble, Steelers football. Desperate, the Colts challenged and along came referee Peter Morelli..."Before he got up he hit it with his leg with his other leg still on the ground," Morelli told a pool reporter after the game. "Therefore, he did not complete the catch. And then he lost the ball. It came out and so we made the play an incomplete pass." With new life, Indy scored just over a minute later to make it a 21-18 game.

The NFL later admitted the call was wrong, but how in the world is an NFL referee capable of overturning such a play? It was blatantly obvious to anyone that Polamalu intercepted the pass, yet the call gets overturned despite the requirement that replay must show "incontrovertible visual evidence" to reverse a decision.

This game was a classic example of why I created refsuck.com and why the NFL has an officiating problem. Incompetent officials who are ignorant of the rules have no business being on the field effecting the outcome of games.

2004 - Worst Calls of the Year

Are You Blind?

Week 16 - Bears @ Lions...With the Bears trailing 19-13 and under 2 minutes remaining, Chicago QB Chad Hutchinson hit receiver Bernard Berrian with a 43 yard touchdown pass. Initially, the pass was ruled incomplete, but with NFL officials reviewing the play, it appeared certain that the play would be overturned and Chicago would be awarded the TD. Replay clearly showed Berrian making the catch with both feet in bounds before crashing to the turf out of bounds. Yet, to the stunned disbelief of the Bears and anyone watching the replay, referee Terry McAulay declared the pass incomplete. Said McAulay, “After review, as the receiver was going to the ground on his own, the ball moved when he hit the ground. It is an incomplete pass as ruled on the field. Third down.'' The ball moved? What the hell is McAulay talking about? The receiver caught the ball in bounds and held onto the ball the entire time.

''I never lost the ball, never bobbled it,'' Berrian said. ''I had two hands on it. Once I hit the ground, I laid on my back because my knee was hurting, but I also wanted to show the ball -- that I had it.''

The Chicago Sun Times said it best…”Forget that receiver Bernard Berrian had two hands on the ball and two feet in bounds. If all it takes to score a touchdown is breaking the plane of the end zone with possession of the ball, why would it matter if the ground caused it to shift? If it did shift, by the way, it only did so in a manner imperceptive to the naked eye.”

Week in and week out, the idiocy of NFL Officials never ceases to amaze me.


They Never Had a Chance

Wouldn't it just figure that New England's favorite NFL ref, Walt Coleman, would be assigned to the AFC Championship game at home? I'm not suggesting bias, but it is worth pointing out that Walt has a history of blown calls that have favored the Patriots. I'd also point out that Walt has a history of botched officiating and has no business being assigned to the conference title game. The very fact that Coleman's crew is working the playoffs is proof positive that the league doesn't give a damn about holding refs accountable.

Specifically, with the Colts down 21-14 and in possession with under 3 minutes remaining, back to back Manning passes fell incomplete due to some questionable coverage. Replays showed Colts tight end Marcus Pollard being tugged and grabbed by Patriots linebacker Roman Phifer as Peyton Manning's passes flew incomplete. "Those guys did what they had to do," Pollard said of the Patriots afterward. "They didn't get called for it. So keep doing it. Hats off to them."

Colts receivers complained repeatedly about being held by Patriots defenders who jammed the pass catchers at the line and bumped them down the field. Dungy, typically a calm sideline observer, was livid on several occasions about perceived no calls. Said Dungy "The disappointing thing to me is there were some things that happened in the game that I just know in my heart in the regular season would be penalties."

Some believe officials should call a game straight up...a penalty is a penalty. I happen to believe that the more important a game, the less the officials should be involved. What's bothersome is that the officials THIS WEEK were lenient with regards to penalties, but LAST WEEK had no problem flagging the Titans (vs. Patriots) for a crucial late holding call that was certainly as marginal as some of the calls that were ignored in this game.

2003 - Worst Calls of the Year

If At First You Don't Succeed

In overtime, Tampa Bay's Simeon Rice was called for "leaping" on a missed Vanderjagt field goal. "What is That?" "That's an unbelievable call!" exclaimed ABC's Al Michaels. Replay clearly shows Rice jumping without the aid of any teammates and landing up against a fellow teammate. According to the rule, it's illegal if a player is "clearly running forward and leaping in an obvious attempt to block a field goal, or try-kick after touchdown and landing on players"

In no way was any illicit behavior or intent even remotely visible. Did Rice land up against a teammate? Yes. Did Rice land on top a teammate in an attempt to gain height to block the kick? Absolutely not. Yet, the refs on the field (backed by league officials), believe Vanderjagt deserved a second kick to win the game. It unbelievable how often NFL refs see things differently from the rest of the world.

To add insult to injury, the NFL has admitted that game officials made a critical error late in the Oct. 6 Monday night game between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Indianapolis Colts. With 3:37 left in the fourth quarter and the Bucs leading 35-21, Colts placekicker Mike Vanderjagt's onside kick sailed airborne and was caught by Colts safety Idrees Bashir at the Indianapolis 42. The Colts took advantage, driving 58 yards for a touchdown and eventually became the first team in league history to rally from 21 points behind in the final four minutes of regulation. They won 38-35 in overtime. Mike Pereira, the NFL's director of officiating, told the San Francisco Chronicle on Tuesday that the game's officials failed to apply Rule 10, Section 1, Article 4, which says that on that type of an onside kick, the receiving team must be given the chance to catch the ball if the ball does not touch the ground. A kicking team is allowed to recover an onside kick providing the ball has traveled 10 yards and has hit the ground. Vanderjagt's kick did not hit the ground, and so the Colts should have been penalized 15 yards from the spot of the foul for interfereing with the Buc's right to catch the ball, according to the NFL. That penalty would have given Tampa Bay the ball at the Indianapolis 27 yard line, the paper reported.


Rules? What Rules?

Shouldn't those who officiate know the rules they expect others to follow? As the Associated Press reported..."On Monday, the NFL, in a statement issued by director of officiating Mike Pereira, admitted its refereeing crew made an "administrative error" by not restarting the clock after a penalty flag was waived off on Seattle's final possession in regulation.

The situation was this: Seattle led 41-38 with less than a minute left. After a second-down play, Baltimore called what appeared to be its final timeout at the same time officials threw a flag on Seattle for illegally placing Floyd Womack, an extra offensive lineman, in the tight end's spot. The flag was waved off, however, when another official noted the player had properly reported into the game as an eligible receiver. Baltimore was not charged with a timeout. However, instead of starting the clock as Seattle contended they should have, the officials kept it stopped. On third down, Seattle was stopped inches short of a first-down, and Baltimore used its final timeout. Matt Hasselbeck then was stopped on a fourth-down quarterback sneak seconds later, turning the ball over to the Ravens with 39 seconds left.

Seattle coach Mike Holmgren protested the earlier stoppage to White and his crew, but to no avail. "Quite frankly, we were playing to knock the clock down to 13 seconds, which would have been the time left on the clock when we went for the quarterback sneak," Holmgren told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. "They would have had 13 seconds with no timeouts. It would have been difficult for them to get the job done, but we were the victim of a rule.""

Baltimore was able to get into field goal range, tie the game, then win in overtime. A critical loss for the Seahawks who now trail the Rams by a game in the division. To add insult to injury, the flag NEVER should have been thrown because Womack legally reported as eligible. Yet another example of NFL Refs blowing a call and directly effecting the outcome of a game, and perhaps a playoff spot.


Ever hear of Pass Interference?

Much like the Patriots, the 49ers are one of those teams which seems to get crucial breaks from the officials on a regular basis. Their 39-38 playoff win over the Giants was no exception. Leading by a point with 6 seconds left, NY lined up for a winning 41 yard field goal. Holder Matt Allen was unable to control the bad snap; thus, passed the ball downfield incomplete as time expired. From the Associated Press..."Mike Pereira, the NFL's director of officiating, informed the Giants and San Francisco 49ers on Monday that a defensive pass interference penalty should have been called on the final play of Sunday's game, which would have allowed the Giants to attempt a potential winning field goal...No pass interference was called on the play and Giants guard Tam Hopkins was flagged for illegally running downfield on the pass attempt. If interference had been called, then the game could not have ended due to offsetting penalties and the Giants could have attempted the field goal. "It was pass interference. It was clearly pass interference," (Giants Coach) Fassel said. "How they missed that, I do not know. It is very disappointing." Pereira admitted that Fassel was right since Seubert had reported to the officiating crew prior to the game as an eligible receiver on field goal attempts and was clearly pushed by Okeafor.'' I cannot say I'm surprised. Seems like every year in the playoffs, the officials are blowing calls that clearly effect the outcome of games.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

2002 - Worst Calls of the Year

The Snow Job, Version 2

In what can only be described as an incorrect analysis of a poorly written rule, the Raiders were screwed out of a trip to the AFC title game by referee Walt Coleman who saw one thing, yet ruled another. With less than 2 minutes remaining in regulation and the Raiders up by three points, cornerback Charles Woodson sacked Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, forcing the slippery ball out of his hands. Oakland linebacker Greg Biekert recovered the loose ball near mid field. New England, out of time outs, also appeared to be out of the playoffs.

Then they decided to review the call on the replay monitor.

After further review, Coleman ruled that Brady had moved his arm forward before Woodson forced the ball loose. Replay clearly shows Brady with both hands on the ball just before he was hit and fumbled. Furthermore, the original call on the field was a fumble. To overturn the call, officials would need conclusive evidence that the original call was wrong. One clever fan pointed out that based on Coleman's interpretation of the rule "Walt Coleman and the NFL have created the no-fumble, no- sack quarterback Step 1: After taking the snap, QB steps back and cocks arm immediately. Step 2: As he drops back in the pocket, QB very, very slowly moves ball forward. Step 3: If hit, QB drops ball at his feet for an incomplete pass. Step 4: If protection holds up, QB finds open receiver, re-cocks arm and throws. Defensive ends will still enjoy hitting the quarterback, but they'll never chalk up another sack."

New England, with its possession revived, produced a 45-yard game-tying field goal with 27 seconds left. In overtime, New England kicker Adam Vinatieri made a 23-yarder to send the Raiders home for the winter.

Naturally, the NFL tried to cover up the botched call by explaining that according to the Tuck Rule, the call was correct. The Tuck Rule reads..."NFL Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2, Note 2: When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble." Note the part that reads "if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble". Now look at the replay and photo above. In both images, Brady has returned the ball to his body and has both hands on the ball as he is hit and fumbles. According to the Tuck Rule, this constitutes a fumble. However, NFL officials attempted to cover their tracks.

NFL Supervisor of Officials Mike Pereira hit the Spin Room running on the Sunday following the game, prop football in hand, saying that when the rule was rewritten in 2000 to absolve the refs of judging "intent to pass", it meant that no fumble is called if a quarterback's arm is in a throwing motion or a pump-fake, and the ball comes loose before the ball is literally tucked back into the body--and here he mimed placing the ball under the arm, like a running back, saying "The ball has to be all the way back at the side of your body, then get jarred loose for it to be a fumble." This echoed Coleman's contention of the night before (again: "He would have had to have brought it all the way in and got it all the way underneath his arm in order for it [to be a fumble]"). Now let me ask you, where does the Tuck Rule state the ball has to be tucked under the quarterbacks arm like a running back? Furthermore, do you ever see a quarterback holding a football tucked under his arm unless he is running down field? If, according to Mike Pereira and Walt Coleman, a quarterback has to tuck the ball under his arm, then virtually every fumble ever committed by a quarterback in NFL history has been a bad call by the officials.


Walt Coleman's Parade of Errors

I received more email about this game that any other game this year. Apparently, Minnesota got screwed. Of course, nobody should be surprised given that Walt Coleman's crew officiated the game. Walt is an embarrassment to the NFL, but I digress. Five controversial calls went the Packers way in a close 26-22 win. First, in the 4th quarter with the Vikings leading, TE Jim Kleinsasser was interfered with/tackled on a third down pass, but no call. Second, The Packers were flagged for an illegal hold on a Packer punt return, but after a conference, Coleman picked up the flag and ruled no foul. Even ESPN announcer Joe Theismann was amazed at that one. Next, Favre's 40 yard TD pass to Robert Ferguson really only covered 38 yards as Ferguson was out of bounds short of the goal line.

The real kicker was a questionable pass interference call on the Vikings Corey Chavous during the Packers game winning drive that negated an interception by teammate Jack Brewer. Some pass interference calls are blatant, but this was no worse than the non-call on Kleinsasser earlier (where's the consistency?). Finally, With 11 seconds remaining in the game, Vikings QB Daunte Culpepper completed a 17-yard pass to receiver Chris Walsh in the middle of the field. With no one around him, Walsh knelt to end the play and give the Vikings a realistic shot at a Hail Mary pass from their own 43-yard line, but Packers defensive back Antuan Edwards pummeled Walsh. The NFL admitted Monday that Walsh should have been ruled down and not hit. As an added bonus, a brawl breaks out between the teams due to the cheap shot on Walsh. On Wednesday, In a confidential memorandum, the NFL acknowledged its officiating crew made at least nine mistakes during the game. All in all, another fine example of Walt Coleman and his bonehead officiating crew blowing another game.



Pre 2002 - Worst Calls of the Year

Replay Controversy (2001)

In a game that clearly illustrates the arrogant, cover-up nature of the NFL and its officials, the Cleveland Browns were eliminated from playoff contention in a 15-10 loss to the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Trailing by five with the ball on Jacksonville's 12-yard line, the Browns were in position for a game-winning score. Tim Couch hit Quincy Morgan on 4th-and-2 to get to the nine-yard line and Couch spiked the ball on the next snap for the stoppage with 48 seconds remaining. But before the Browns could run their second-down play, referee Terry McAulay announced that the replay officials had buzzed to request a review of Morgan's reception.

"The buzzer on my belt went off just prior to the snap," McAulay said. "We are playing football and I realize the buzzer has gone off. I go to the umpire and he says, yes, his buzzer is going off too." NFL rules state a play cannot be reviewed after another play is run. In addition, replay shows that no official made a motion toward his buzzer until after the ensuing play had been completed. "(I said to) Bill Reynolds, did you press the buzzer prior to the snap? He said, 'Absolutely, 100-percent,'" McAulay said. "At that point we had a legal review. We go in and review the play. The ball is coming loose, hits the ground, incomplete pass."

The pass was ruled incomplete, ending the Browns’ chances of scoring a late touchdown to complete the rally and sending the home crowd into a frenzy. Browns fans in the "Dawg Pound" bleacher section closest to the play began tossing bottles and other objects from the stands. As further example of the blatant nature in which the officiating crew ignored NFL rules, McAulay announced the game was over despite the fact that he does not have the power to call off a game before it is complete. While both teams were in the locker room, NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue called and ordered the final 48 seconds be played.


Get Out of the Way! (2001)

Referee Phil Luckett, best known for the Thanksgiving Coin Flip Controversy, added another notch to his belt. Luckett, working the Saints-Panthers game, interfered with Saints receiver Joe Horn on a likely touchdown pass. Horn had beaten Panthers strong safety Mike Minter and was ready to catch the ball and run into the end zone when Luckett got in his way. The ball hit Luckett in the head and bounced to the turf.


Super Bowl Ripoff (2001)

Super Bowl XXXV, Giants defender Jesse Armstead intercepted Ravens QB Trent Dilfer and scored a touchdown that was called back for defensive holding. The following Wednesday the NFL admitted the call was wrong and apologized. While the Ravens won 34-7, the interception temporarily brought the Giants back into the game...until it was erroneously taken away.


Emanuel's "Catch" (1999)

As noted on ESPN's list of "Worst Calls in Sports History", the Tampa Bay Buccaneers drive and season ended in the 1999 NFC Championship game when Bert Emanuel's late game catch was overruled on reply. Emanuel made a thirteen yard reception at the Rams' 22 yard line with 47 seconds remaining in the game, which would have given Tampa Bay a realistic chance to continue a potential game-winning drive. Replays show the ball was clearly in Emanuel's grasp when it touched the turf. Emanuel's Bucs lose 11-6 to the Rams. The enusing controversy prompted the NFL to clarify the rule regarding what constitutes a valid pass reception. This would come to be known as "The Bert Emanuel Rule."


Rice's Fumble (1999)

Trailing 27-23 with under a minute remaining in their first round playoff game, 49er receiver Jerry Rice caught a 6 yard pass at the Packer 41 yard line, but Packers linebacker Bernardo Harris and nickel back Scott McGarrahan stripped the ball and Harris pounced on it. The Packers began celebrating their fourth straight playoff victory over the 49ers and a trip to face the Falcons in the second-round. Unfortunately for Green Bay, line judge Jeff Bergman said Rice never fumbled, and although field judge Kevin Mack had a better view, he didn't overrule his colleague. Four plays later, Steve Young hit receiver Terrell Owens with the game winning touchdown. CNN/SI's Dr. Z put it best..."The Rice thing was a flat-out blown call. He fumbled. Period." Replay indeed confirmed that Rice had fumbled; however, instant replay was not re-instated for another year.


The Poke (1999)

Cleveland Brown offensive lineman Orlando Brown is struck in the eye with a penalty flag thrown by referee Jerry Triplette. First came a league suspension for pushing Triplette as he tried to leave the field, an incident Brown claims was misinterpreted. Nine months later Brown was released because his vision remained impaired to the point he was unable to pass a physical examination. Brown was out of football for over 3 years until signing a one year deal in 2003 with the Baltimore Ravens. At the time, he had a six-year, $27 million contract, from which he collected a $7.5 million signing bonus. Brown has since sued the league for negligence. Said U.S. District Judge Gerard E. Lynch "had a fan attending the game been struck by a negligently thrown penalty flag, there is no question that a cause of action would lie against the referee and the NFL, on exactly the grounds raised by Brown."


Is that a Helmet or a Football? (1998)

In a December battle between the Jets and Seahawks, NY QB Vinny Testaverde's 5 yard TD run with 20 seconds to go lifted the Jets to a 32-31 victory. One small problem...Vinny was actually stopped short of the end zone. NFL Head of Officiating, Jerry Seemen, later confirmed the call was incorrect, but excused the official claiming the call was made because the official saw the helmet cross the goal line, and thought it was the ball. I don't know about you, but I can clearly tell the difference between a brown football and a white helmet. Are NFL officials required to take annual eye exams?






Thanksgiving Coin Flip Controversy (1998)

After the Lions had rallied from a 13-3 third-quarter deficit to force overtime, the captains from Detroit and Pittsburgh met at midfield to begin the process of deciding matters in sudden death. As referee Phil Luckett tossed the coin in the air, controversy ensued. The coin came up tails. To a nation of fans watching on CBS, Pittsburgh running back Jerome Bettis had called it accurately. Unfortunately for the Steelers and their fans, Phil Luckett somehow heard heads and awarded the ball to Detroit.

Both teams vociferously defended their viewpoints — although only the Lions ended up winning the coin toss, which they converted into a game-winning field goal from Jason Hanson just 2:52 into overtime. But in football, unlike in the legal system, the routes to an appeal are few; Luckett served as judge, jury and executioner. What followed after the game was mere hot air on both sides, with eac

h intractably convinced of the validity of their particular argument.

"I did not say heads-tails" Bettis said. "When (Luckett) went to flip the coin, it almost hit him, so he jumped away from it. I have to believe that caused him to forget what I said, but I said tails as clear as day."


The Snow Job (1982)

Stuff Magazine said it best...

With five minutes to play, the Pats called time-out to set up for a 23-yard field-goal attempt. But with the field covered in muck, this was no chip shot. Enter Mark Henderson, a convicted felon on a work-release program. (He was serving 15 years for robbery, an irony about to become apparent.) Patriot coach Ron Meyer told him to drive his snowplow onto the field and illegally clear a spot for kicker John Smith to tee up. With the officials’ heads apparently buried in the snow, Smith spanked the pig through the uprights for a 3–0 win. New England papers hailed Henderson’s plowing skills as “the sweep of the day.”


Faux Fumble (1978)

In a game that helped bring instant replay to the NFL, the Denver Broncos defeated the Oakland Raiders 20-17 in the AFC Championship.

The Broncos lead 7-3 midway through the 3rd quarter and had a first and goal at the Oakland 2 yard line. Running back Rob Lytle took the handoff, but was met by Oakland defender Jack Tatum, who knocked the ball out. Raider linebacker Mike McCoy picked up the loose ball and returned it for an apparent Raider touchdown. Unbelievably, after a lengthy discussion, officials ruled no fumble. Denver scored shortly thereafter to take a 14-3 lead. Television replay clearly showed Lytle did fumble. "Sure I fumbled" Lytle later said. In the press box, infuriated Raider owner Al Davis reportedly yelled "What's going on here?!" NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle sat silently a few seats away.

Art McNally, former head of NFL Officials, later admitted "It was a fumble and we were wrong on the call". Gee, thanks.


Sugar Bear's Rougning Call (1976)

Late in the game, with New England leading 21-17, Raider quarterback Ken Stabler heaved a desperation pass that fell incomplete. It appeared that the Patriots had pulled off one of the greatest upsets in playoff history. Unfortunately for the Patriots, in stepped referee Ben Dreith.

Dreith flagged Pats' defensive lineman Ray "Sugar Bear" Hamilton with a bogus roughing the passer call. Stabler took advantage of the second chance and eventually scored the winning touchdown in a 24-21 Oakland victory.


Hail Mary (1975)

It is December 12th, 1975. The place — Metropolitan Stadium, Bloomington, Minn. The Minnesota Vikings and Dallas Cowboys had fought to a 10-7 Dallas lead for most of 4 quarters of football. Finally, with 1:51 left in the game, Fran Tarkenton's Viking offense capped a drive with a TD, to go ahead 14-10. Dallas now needed another TD of their own. Dallas reached the 50, but with only 36 seconds left, the Cowboys chances seemed tenuous at best. Lining up once again in shotgun formation, Staubach took the snap, pump-faked left, then turned to his right and fired the ball deep downfield. Cowboys WR Drew Pearson was out there, being shadowed by Vikings CB Nate Wright. As the ball came down, Pearson pushed off of Wright and caught the pass, trapping it against his hip at the 5-yard line. As Pearson strode into the end zone, free safety Paul Krause hurdled over Wright, screaming at field judge Armen Terzian for the interference call that was never made. Drew Pearson later admitted to former Viking RB Chuck Foreman (who played in the game) that he did indeed intentionally commit offensive pass interference against Nate Wright.